Saying No, So You Can Say Yes When it Matters

I have a problem: It’s really hard for me to say no to new, exciting projects.

If you’re doing creative work at all (and I’m using this term very broadly, so that should mean just about everybody), then you’ve probably run into this problem yourself. There are endless options for how you could spend your time, and how you decide to do so will obviously have implications for your financial life.

Every time I get on Twitter or Instagram, even for just a minute, I see people doing these really cool projects. There are so many ideas out there that it seems like they are becoming a dime a dozen. But getting the main stuff done — that’s pretty valuable too.

This brings me back to my problem. Given the seemingly infinite set of options for how we can spend our time, the ability to say no is an increasingly rare and valuable skill.

I was thinking about this the other day as I wrote a note to a friend, telling her that I just couldn’t participate in a really cool project she had asked me to be involved with. I hadn’t really committed to the project, but I had been excited about getting involved, had expressed my excitement to her and then realized I just couldn’t do it.

It took me three days to write this email. I found it super hard.

Writing this rejection letter reminded me of a recent experience with another friend. He is a doctor who works in the emergency department at a major university hospital and also teaches at the associated medical school. Because he was so good at everything he did, he was always being asked if he could do more. “Will you serve on this committee?” or “Can you help with this research project?” The requests were endless.

Like many of us, he had a hard time saying no. And it was getting him into trouble. Not only was it compromising his work, but it was also affecting his time outside of work.

Finally, his wife had enough. So she pulled out a 3-inch by 5-inch index card and wrote in big, bold letters the word NO. She put the card in the pocket of his scrubs, sat him down and told him, “Every time you’re asked to do something new, I want you to just pull this card out of your pocket and read it.”

At first, when he pulled out this card, he’d shrug and read it sort of sheepishly, almost like he was asking a question. I know, because shortly after his wife gave him the card, I asked him if he’d like to help me with something and he had to tell me no. But as he practiced, the ability to say no started to grow on him. He got better and better at turning down new projects that he simply couldn’t fit into his schedule.

Learning to say no is incredibly important, but it’s also important to understand why we say it. As we learn to say no to certain projects, we’re left with more room to give an emphatic “yes” to other ones. If you want to learn more about this idea, Greg McKeown’s book, “Essentialism,” is a great place to start. Mr. McKeown makes a strong case for the importance of learning to say no as a creative professional, so you can devote more time and energy to the things that matter most.

But in the meantime, pull out an index card and write the word NO. Put an exclamation mark on it, stick it in your pocket and practice. Like my friend, you might feel kind of sheepish at the beginning. But over time, it will be easier and you’ll spend more time on things you’re glad you could say yes to.

This commentary originally appeared January 18 on NYTimes.com

By clicking on any of the links above, you acknowledge that they are solely for your convenience, and do not necessarily imply any affiliations, sponsorships, endorsements or representations whatsoever by us regarding third-party Web sites. We are not responsible for the content, availability or privacy policies of these sites, and shall not be responsible or liable for any information, opinions, advice, products or services available on or through them.

The opinions expressed by featured authors are their own and may not accurately reflect those of the BAM ALLIANCE. This article is for general information only and is not intended to serve as specific financial, accounting or tax advice.

© 2016, The BAM ALLIANCE

Upcoming SEC-mandated changes to money market funds

Quick Take on Fixed Income
February 2016

Q: What are the upcoming SEC-mandated changes to money market funds, and what impact will they have?

A: In 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission released new rules governing the operation of money market funds that will go into effect by October 2016. The biggest changes pertain to their liquidity and who can hold certain funds.

Money markets must designate their funds as either “retail” or “institutional.” Institutional money markets are required to have floating net asset values (NAVs). Retail money markets are not subject to this requirement and may seek to have a stable $1 NAV. Retail funds must be held by individuals and are not open to institutions, businesses and other organizations.

Both retail and institutional funds could be subject to liquidity fees or redemption gates once the new rules go into effect. These new tools are designed to prevent runs on the fund during periods of high stress. All prime and municipal money markets will be subject to the potential fees or gates. A prime fund is one that does not fit into the government or municipal category. Typical investments are corporate bonds and commercial paper. As an example, if prescribed liquidity levels fall below a certain threshold, the fund could impose a 2 percent liquidity fee on redemptions. The fund may also suspend redemptions for up to 10 days while markets settle.

U.S. Treasury and government funds are exempt from the floating NAV, liquidity fees and redemption gate requirements. Because of this, there will be no retail or institutional designation for these funds. The SEC requires that 99.5 percent of the funds be invested in cash, government securities or repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized. At this point, the designated “core” money markets at Schwab, Fidelity and TD Ameritrade will be U.S. Treasury/government funds.

With these new regulations, our approach remains consistent. We continue to recommend investing in U.S. Treasury or government money market funds. They offer the highest combination of safety and liquidity. As long as money market fund yields remain very low, there is no reason to denigrate credit quality or create potential illiquidity for minimal additional yield. Investors with larger money market fund balances may find it advantageous to determine whether there are better options based on their specific liquidity needs.

Copyright © 2016, The BAM ALLIANCE. This material and any opinions contained are derived from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and the opinions based thereon are not guaranteed. The content of this publication is for general information only and is not intended to serve as specific financial, accounting or tax advice. To be distributed only by a Registered Investment Advisor firm. Information regarding references to third-party sites: Referenced third-party sites are not under our control, and we are not responsible for the contents of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site, or any changes or updates to such sites. Any link provided to you is only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement of the site.

Upcoming SEC-mandated changes to money market funds

Quick Take on Fixed Income
February 2016

Q: What are the upcoming SEC-mandated changes to money market funds, and what impact will they have?

A: In 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission released new rules governing the operation of money market funds that will go into effect by October 2016. The biggest changes pertain to their liquidity and who can hold certain funds.

Money markets must designate their funds as either “retail” or “institutional.” Institutional money markets are required to have floating net asset values (NAVs). Retail money markets are not subject to this requirement and may seek to have a stable $1 NAV. Retail funds must be held by individuals and are not open to institutions, businesses and other organizations.

Both retail and institutional funds could be subject to liquidity fees or redemption gates once the new rules go into effect. These new tools are designed to prevent runs on the fund during periods of high stress. All prime and municipal money markets will be subject to the potential fees or gates. A prime fund is one that does not fit into the government or municipal category. Typical investments are corporate bonds and commercial paper. As an example, if prescribed liquidity levels fall below a certain threshold, the fund could impose a 2 percent liquidity fee on redemptions. The fund may also suspend redemptions for up to 10 days while markets settle.

U.S. Treasury and government funds are exempt from the floating NAV, liquidity fees and redemption gate requirements. Because of this, there will be no retail or institutional designation for these funds. The SEC requires that 99.5 percent of the funds be invested in cash, government securities or repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized. At this point, the designated “core” money markets at Schwab, Fidelity and TD Ameritrade will be U.S. Treasury/government funds.

With these new regulations, our approach remains consistent. We continue to recommend investing in U.S. Treasury or government money market funds. They offer the highest combination of safety and liquidity. As long as money market fund yields remain very low, there is no reason to denigrate credit quality or create potential illiquidity for minimal additional yield. Investors with larger money market fund balances may find it advantageous to determine whether there are better options based on their specific liquidity needs.

Copyright © 2016, The BAM ALLIANCE. This material and any opinions contained are derived from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and the opinions based thereon are not guaranteed. The content of this publication is for general information only and is not intended to serve as specific financial, accounting or tax advice. To be distributed only by a Registered Investment Advisor firm. Information regarding references to third-party sites: Referenced third-party sites are not under our control, and we are not responsible for the contents of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site, or any changes or updates to such sites. Any link provided to you is only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement of the site.